Is Slovakia Ready For Freedom Of Speech ?

Free Speech

November 18, 2017

Allan Stevo

Slovakia is a brilliantly free country. Anyone can get away with saying anything they want in private. Political correctness is largely laughed at and has not penetrated the home. Throughout the West political correctness (a movement meant to limit the scope of public debate and thought) has penetrated the home (a place of private discussion and thought).

The American dinner table fought back against this social movement over the last two years with their support of a political candidate who was not so certain to perform any differently than the others in broken D.C., but who spoke so very openly and differently from the candidates who had spent so much time in politically correct D.C. He said the things that you might hear around the dinner table and that no one had dared say for years in public. Trump represented a social movement away from the repressive movement known as political correctness and back toward the American free thought and free expression experiment known as freedom of speech.

The self-appointed intellectual elite denounced him and their fellow countrymen for some twenty months. This only seemed to bolster his success. The self-appointed intellectual elite, after all, were so central to the whole problem. They had told Americans for years how to speak and scolded those who didn’t follow the rules. Americans had grown a little sick of it. The 2015 rise of Donald Trump and his 2016 electoral victories was certainly political, but it was far more importantly social. Americans had had enough of the self-appointed intellectual elite and their insistent browbeating about the latest thought crimes. They were ready to unleash a freer way of being, communicating, and thinking that did feel like a great part of America, that cherished value of free expression.

Slovakia two years earlier saw the election of a non status quo thinker. All the self-appointed intellectual elite were horrified, especially the self-appointed intellectual elite who looked to the West for instruction and permission on how to behave. Instead of recognizing it as an important social statement from the heart of Slovakia, it was seen as a threatening political coup. One must be very insecure in oneself and ones worldview and very power hungry to have such a reaction. After all, it was for a tiny local office. Great strides were taken and significant foreign money and influence was used to help keep this man out of office, to end the political coup. That does little to address the far more important social trends at hand in Slovakia, where a significant portion of the population are not wowed by the self-appointed intellectual elite who take instruction and permission from the West.

Marian Kotleba, a man I would perhaps dislike if I spent much time listening to him, has every right to say anything that’s on his mind to anyone he so desires. It doesn’t matter what I think of him. It doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks of him. His existence on this planet as a human being provides him with the freedom of speech to say anything on his mind.

Slovakia, deep in its social structure, has a brave sense of free speech within the home. Sit at any Slovak dinner table and you will learn that. You will have statements said to you in quiet confidence in private settings that have for years been deemed too uncomfortable to consider in the West. I’m not just talking politics either. From health and nutrition to wellness to interpersonal relationships to how to raise livestock to economic issues, Slovakia is a wellspring of free thought and it’s dinner tables and homes are where that thought flows most freely. Years from now, if political correctness ever takes hold in political life, Slovaks may see it take hold in private life as well, just as the West has long ago seen it take hold. That is a long way away. Slovakia truly is a place of very free thought.

Today, Slovaks are confronted with a political option. It is the further encroachment of political correctness into private lives by encroaching on political speech in public life. To truly respect freedom of speech, the law should be that if Marian Kotleba is speaking, or anyone else, then the government may not act in any way to silence them.. That is not the role of the government and to even discuss such a topic is not in the purview of government. Such a discussion – a discussion on how to limit free speech in Slovakia – should not even happen on the floor of the Slovak Parliament or in government buildings. It’s none of their concern. If there are to be any limits to speech it should be limits on government and not on individuals. Government is the great enemy of freedom. The last 100 years of totalitarian regimes has so effectively demonstrated how cruel an enemy of freedom governments can be.

Marian Kotleba, by simply speaking, and by simply saying things that make others uncomfortable, acts to expand the the role of free speech in Slovakia, acts to expand the freedoms. Based on the reactions I hear from him, he expands the concept of free expression far better than any contemporary artist, writer, activist, or politico. He is a living, breathing expander of free expression seemingly without even trying. There’s great beauty in that. I know so little about him. I see a great deal of the very positive impact he has by uncomfortably expanding free expression as uptight people listen to him horrified.

And yes, Slovaks will say “Oh you know -it-all American, you don’t know how important it is to silence the wrong people. We have a different history than you, we had extremism in the past. ” To which I say, they have extremism in the present – those people who would silence another person’s free speech are vile extremists. There are those who seek to silence Kotleba from speaking freely in public. 28 years after the end of communism, vile Slovaks are ganging up politically to silence another person from speaking. 28 years after totalitarian rule, vile Slovaks are taking a step toward that way of thinking again and toward the ugly system of governing that follows.

Socially, Slovaks are free speakers, with little societal inhibition on free speech in private places. Politically, the Slovak government and their self-appointment intellectuals who look to the West for instruction and permission could take note of that fact and align Slovakia’s politically enshrined freedoms with the very sensible social freedoms that already exist. The more unfamiliar, the more threatening a person’s beliefs are, the more vital it is that they be shared and allowed space to be publicly debated.

That is freedom of speech. Slovakia has long had freedom of speech around the dinner table. Now it is time for the insecure, easily threatened, self-appointed intellectuals to back off and allow that in public as well. Once again, the more threatening it is, the more unfamiliar it is, the better that free speech is. Free speech encourages free thought, instead of the crap that we hear in the West. Thank you Slovakia for being such a shining example in my own life of how freely one may think and speak around the dinner table. Now, instead of moving in the direction of greater oppression, by silencing unfamiliar or threatening viewpoints, how about we see a fraction of that Slovak social freedom extended into public life.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Unless of course Slovakia isn’t ready for freedom of speech – a ludicrous idea that the self appointed intellectuals who take instruction and permission from the west quietly insist to be the truth. How disgusting to watch these extremists seek to take silence the voice of anyone. Slovakia can have better. The true extremists – the ones in positions of power – should be exposed.

Photo credit: Slovak Women of Vojvodina

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Using Intensity To Fight Complacency Within Oneself


November 18, 2017

Allan Stevo

The beauty of Krav Maga is not that a runt can defend himself from a man twice as skilled and twice his size, but that even the runt can learn to channel an available and powerful inner rage at the appropriate moment.

In our comfortable and safe Western world, certainly the most comfortable of any developed civilization to have ever existed and arguably the safest and least violent per capita of any large civilization in human history, it is easy to grow complacent.

With the rights of the individual so well secured and established virtually across Western society, complacency becomes the great obstacle to human achievement.

And what an obstacle it is. Why change a thing when the herd offers such security and comfort. That herd allows you a tremendous array of fashion – that range from tattoos and eyebrow piercings to Brook’s Brothers and bow ties, the herd allows for a tremendous array of diets – ranging from Wonderbread to Ethiopian food, and the herd offers a tremendous array of political views – ranging from Marxist-feminist to Tea Party – if you want to be a respected part of mainstream society. The true rebel has to be pretty far out there in this era to not be complacent in their mainstream existence.

Furthermore, there is the great friend of complacency – arrogance. How easy it is to find someone complacent and arrogant about what a rebel they are, yet so conservative in their outlook on the world and frightened of any true risk. Tattoos are not risky. They are a trite and superficial way to take risk. Free markets are risky. Entrepreneurship is risky. Packing a back pack for a month with a one way ticket to a village 83 miles from Timbuktu where you know no one and don’t speak the language is risky. No matter how strange it might seem to your parents or the people you grew up with – a sleeve of tattoos, a co-op membership, a job as a forlorn barista, an alternative romantic lifestyle, universal healthcare, universal basic income, and a cadre of friends who are superficially very diverse, but really 95% the same is not risky. Instead it smacks of complacency. That is exactly the ideal life that many of America’s trendiest urban youth clamor for – the complacent life. It’s an easy trap to fall into.

To know what is right and wrong in your own mind, to be self-certain at such moments, and to add passion to it with a ready application of intensity can be hard to muster. There’s a beauty to regularly practicing each of those skills, among them the calling up of intensity, so that even in the most complacent of environments, that intensity is ready to be called upon.

When punches per second matters. When first strike matters. When who can beat the other into submission in five or ten or twenty seconds matters and you train that over and over again, those short, violent, intense bursts, you come into contact with a beautiful impulse within oneself, normally cajoled out of existence by the comforts of everyday life. And with enough of that training, suddenly that impulse becomes accessible and something able to be summoned. Summoned on command. A deep and true thing within you, that modern life disconnects you from that can now be summoned on command. How truly beautiful a practice is if it can help you evoke that.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Photo credit: CGP Grey

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Pravda víťazí” – Slovak Version

November 18, 2017

Allan Stevo

“Pravda víťazí” – Tublatanka playing the Slovak version of “Pravda víťazí.”

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Pravda víťazí” – English Version

November 18, 2017

Allan Stevo

“Pravda víťazí” – Tublatanka playing the English version of “Pravda víťazí.” The original is better, but this video does a good job of making the band, and its anthem of the times, available to foreign audiences.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How To Celebrate The Velvet Revolution

Velvet Revolution

November 17, 2017

Allan Stevo

November 17 is widely considered the anniversary of the Velvet Revolution, when Czechoslovakia’s Communist Government fell.  Determining such dates is not very cut and dry and on November 17, 1989 virtually no one in Czechoslovakia realized the significance of what was happening  – at least that’s what I have gathered from the many accounts I have pieced together.

For the last ten years I have written something on the anniversary of the Velvet Revolution and most years I’ve sat in front of a TV with my friend Olga for a few hours watching reruns of what played on Czechoslovak television in the fall and winter of 1989.

Anyone who knows a Slovak or Czech speaker who lived through that time and has access to the television footage from the Velvet Revolution is missing a perfect opportunity to learn a great deal about Slovak culture.  Buy a few beers, cook a pot of gulas, and invite your Slovak or Czech friend over to watch the old footage with you.

Click here to keep reading How To Celebrate The Velvet Revolution

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This Is The Day Of The Bloodless

The Bloodless

November 16, 2017

Allan Stevo

Yugoslavia split in a great war.  Czechoslovakia changed largely peacefully in a “Gentle Revolution” as the Slovaks call it, or “Velvet Revolution” as the Czechs say.  Also largely peaceful, the split of Czechoslovakia was later called the “Velvet Divorce.”  Written on the twentieth anniversary of the Velvet Revolution, this poem depicts the attitude I often feel venturing out into the moist November air on the 17th of the month in Slovakia. It will appear in an upcoming book of mine to be published by Scars Press, Chicago.

This is the day of the bloodless

This is the day of
the bloodless
revolution that didn’t
among the Slavs of

This is the day that
brought forth the philosopher
king of Plato’s dreams

And somehow,
this November
became glorious, the
kind of day where
you can see the light
is what
became of the 17th
A day of revolution,
of fire, one that does
not burn, but refuses
only slightly threateningly
to cooperate
Either a day to see
the light or a
day to practice
forgetting, and somehow
when I stepped out, I
knew it was a day to
see the light.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at  He is from Chicago and spends most of his time travelling Europe and writing.  You can find more of his writing at  If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email.  You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When Ignoring The U.S. Embassy’s Advice Is A Good Policy

Travel Tips

November 15, 2017

Allan Stevo

The U.S. Department of State regularly advises travelers to register with the local U.S. Embassy when traveling. When I do this I am usually rewarded with important information. Though the information is meant to warn me of places I should not venture, I often take a different tack.

The U.S. Embassy in Bratislava performs an important service for me. It tells me what the really good events to go to are. From time to time public demonstrations take place in Slovakia. From time to time those public demonstrations are expected to be so interesting that they are noticed by the U.S. Embassy and the U.S. Embassy warn U.S. citizens residing in Bratislava to steer clear. One should do quite the opposite, especially in a country as peaceful as Slovakia.

These demonstrations are sometimes 1. Big 2. Loud or 3. Organized by extremist elements in Slovak society. Those are all reasons to attend. More often than not these events fizzle and are poorly attended.  No matter how big or small they are, they are always an opportunity to break the ice and to hear what makes a person tick.

Click here to keep reading When Ignoring The U.S. Embassy’s Advice Is A Good Policy

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Western Europe Has Long Been Friendly To Socialism, America Has Long Been UN-Friendly To Socialism And Should Remain So


November 15, 2017

Allan Stevo

It can be hard to talk to many Western Europeans about politics. They have such comfort with socialism. Some – a solid portion of the people of Vienna would be one such example – almost seem to lament that their land was unable to spend the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s of the last century on the same side of the Iron Curtain as the Slovaks, Czechs, Hungarians, East Germans, and the many other cultures trapped under that oppressive rule. It’s a terrible chapter in history that some portion of Western Europeans don’t adequately recognize the horrors of. Therefore, those same people enjoy flirting with the fringes of such inhumane and anti-human ideas.

That period behind the Iron Curtain was a rough time to be an advocate for freedom and a rough time to be alive if you wanted to be more than a sheep in the midst of the herd. “The grass that never grew tall didn’t get mowed down,” has been said to me time and again in different variations by Slovaks and others who lived under totalitarian rule. Individual excellence was frowned upon because individual excellence made you a target. Go to work, be mediocre, help out an authority figure when asked, go home to live your life quietly and privately, follow the rules and everything would be okay. Do not stand out. No matter how good of a reason you thought you had for standing out, from the thinking of many at the time who lived under totalitarian rule – it was always sure to be bad to stand out. Conformity was key.

The communist governments of Central and Eastern Europe excelled at this undermining of the individual. The socialist governments of Western Europe are not as effective at this, but are still effective at undermining the will of the individual.

Much writing has been done on how modern society so encapsulates the individual, rendering the individual effete and individual decisions so inconsequential that life has so little feeling and even less meaning. I turn to the existentialist movement, the writers of which have written tomes about this topic, or to many non-existentialists who wrote on the topic of human achievement as W.H. Auden did in his poem “The Unknown Citizen” or Hemingway in his grimly titled “For Whom the Bell Tolls,” or many others who saw the comfort and conformity of modernity as stifling to individual pursuits and restrictive to human development.

It is, after all, the outliers who achieve as outliers and eventually the mass of humanity comes along to follow them. It is not the mass of humanity that leads the way. No achievement happens from the guy sitting on his couch watching TV and drinking a six pack.

The guy on his couch, however, is part of the hard-to-stop, hard-to-redirect inertia of the status quo. His very existence, from the perspective of those seeking change, is to lend inertia. Inertia is okay. I don’t fault Joe six pack for that role. I do fault the philosopher, economist, or politician who advocate for a system that discourages individual potential and encourage more people to turn into Joe six packs.

It is additionally important to realize a consequence of so much comfort in the world – to make a stable, unchanging society even easier to achieve. If you could lock society into this precise moment in history and could make society as similar to now for as long as possible, is that the choice you would make? Probably not.

Some people mourn days bygone. Some people sit excited for the future. It’s hard to find someone who says “The world is absolutely perfect at this moment in time and should never change.” Yet, by supporting the socialist / democratic socialist / communist doctrines of contemporary Western Europe and seeking to advance them in America you do exactly that – you seek to solidify the present and to undermine change in mainstream American society. Additionally, you further isolate change agents on the fringes of society.

This is bad because it prevents the mainstream from being change agents. Also it prevents the mainstream from mingling with change agents. It further solidifies the status quo by removing change agents and pro-change-agent sentiments from the mainstream.

The impact of free market capitalism, to the contrary, offers incentives for every hobbyist to consider being an entrepreneur, every tinkerer to be a potential change agent. Change agents are not pushed artificially to the fringes of society in a free market – quite the contrary. When government steps aside, by stepping aside, government lowers the artificial governmental barriers to entry and that scenario makes it more advantageous for individuals to pursue their passions, perhaps some even doing so for profit. In a free market, human achievement is not artificially stifled in the name of leveling society and bringing egalitarianism.

There are things Western Europe is good at – working against development, solidifying the role of the aristocracy, sitting on their magnificent cultural laurels, giving bread (comfy pay checks), beer (awesome beer and wine), circuses (Eurovision and soccer), and leisure (35 hour work weeks) to their middle class to keep them content, and, of course, they are good at turning into an exploding powder keg of discontent every few generations then waging war on each other. It’s possible the war issue has finally been solved by the extensive bread and circuses, along with some cross cultural trade. Meanwhile, their aristocracy make their money overseas investing in places that are not so hardened by the layers of social plaque existent in Europe, a social plaque that stunts virtually all change or growth. America, “the new world,” is exactly that kind of place – where the European aristocracy invest and where society’s structure is not so calcified. They do business there and send their children there to learn the local ways. Other places in the world are similar – lacking in the burdensome social plaque of Western Europe – like parts of Central and Eastern Europe or parts of Asia – where individual achievement is praised, to an extent.

There are some in America who would love to mitigate exactly that. They propose the same failed policies that restrict individual achievement and promote the same type of social plaque that exists in Europe. Anyone who cherry picks the seemingly positive points of Europe to advocate for a greater level of government and ultimately to advocate for stepping toward socialism is guilty of exactly that – promoting the stifling social plaque that restrains Europe and pushes America toward that same stifling environment.

America plays a special role in the world. It is the experimental engine of growth. It is a place where entrepreneurship is uniquely promoted. It is a place where business is treated as the entity for social betterment that it is. There is great freedom to take risks. There is also great freedom to fail or succeed. It is a truly beautiful equation that needs no tweaking. It only needs to be left alone to work at its best.

Yes, in America we have a huge homeless population, and more billionaires live in America than anywhere else, and even more than that made their fortunes through American innovation. It is an engine of human achievement and growth. It is a land that generally allows for great success and great failure. That lack of social restriction and that lack of a social safety net, two items that are one in the same, has been a prominent distinction in American history. And the two sides of the coin, as far as human kind has proven, are necessary for that ultimate engine of human achievement. Some level of scarcity seems to be needed. Some level of risk seems to be needed.

That is how it has worked so far. Perhaps that scenario will change. Perhaps there will be other ways to allow for human achievement without leaving so many to fend for themselves. I am open to that. I respect new experiments from people endeavoring to live their own lives better and convincing others to voluntarily do the same. Despite all that hopefulness, it is obvious where that new model of social change won’t come from. It won’t come out of the tired and constantly proven wrong governmental methods of egalitarianism – see Plato, see Marx, see Lenin, see Mao, see Stalin, see the contemporary Western European counties, see the mainstream of American politics, see the frighteningly popular Bernie Sanders.

These examples all fit the tired and staid Europe. These examples, in which a portion of society that has earned enough to support themselves is being forced to pay for those who did not earn enough to support themselves, have repeatedly failed us as a society. They have failed humanity.

These broken, yet popular methods of social organization have limited human development through history. The examples are plentiful.

Some historians even go so far as to point to the bubonic plague as a scenario that could only happen under the oppressive, cruel governments of the time. The point out that human existence was so downtrodden and malnourished as a result of such high limitation on human freedom and development that it was possible for an illness to sweep through the downtrodden, unhealthy populace. It just happened to be that particular bacteria – Yersinia pestis – that swept through the population and the accompanying illness than decimated them, an illness and bacteria that continue to exist today and do not decimate populations. Because the populations of Europe were left so impoverished and weak by such terrible policies, any of a list of illnesses could have easily come through and been just as effective of a killer.

In recent memory, there were people in the West who could not get enough calories to survive. We are beyond that time. An over-abundance of calories has become a far greater threat to survival. Over generations, through technology and trade, we have banished hunger in a portion of the world. The calories may not be the most healthful calories, but 2,000-3,000 calories daily is possible for every adult who wants to put in the effort to seek those calories out. For $5 a day you can even obtain those calories somewhat nutritiously from a fast food establishment like McDonald’s. This is not ideal from my perspective, but this is a vast improvement on the post World War II poverty that was rampant across Europe. Could any swollen bellied child of the time imagine that one day, with twenty or thirty minutes of work, anyone would be able to buy a warm, delicious sandwich that was made from high grade beef, soft bread, and fresh vegetables?

I strongly dislike McDonald’s. I haven’t eaten a Big Mac or breakfast sandwich in perhaps ten years now. That doesn’t change the fact that McDonald’s is the preference of many people around the world. McDonald’s provides a relatively stable high quality experience across countries, cultures, supply chains, and currencies. Many people deservedly got rich building McDonald’s into the organization that it is. It drives down local prices and drives up local levels of quality. It even provides a fairly decent entry level job. The people who made that happen deserve to be rich.

It’s perhaps also worth noting that those who excelled in society and made a killing for themselves also brought great advancement in the quality of living to the rest of us schlubs who have never been part of the ultra wealthy.

Has Bill Gates improved your life or made it worse? You and the vast majority of computer users in the world have freely chosen to run his software. Your life is made easier by Microsoft at home and outside of the home in the vast array of companies that use Microsoft products to make your life easier and better. John Rockefeller made himself rich while making easy-to-access in-home energy, once an impossibility for the middle class, readily available to the middle class and ultimately even available to some of the poorest people in the United States. Steve Jobs made himself a billionaire by helping push forward some of the most life changing innovations of the last century – a user friendly well designed super computer in the pocket of every man woman and child, and a third party App Store that encourages amazing innovations for that tool. Henry Ford became rich innovating the car manufacturing process so well that some of the poorest Americans can have one, and put in place innovations that made it possible for even a relative child to drive a car.

The rich in America tend to make the world a better place through their business dealings. And sure it may feel unfair that someone like Warren Buffet, who is little more than a smart financier, a smart mergers and acquisitions guy, and a smart investor, has made himself and others so rich. On the surface, it appears like he hasn’t added a lot of value to society, because he hasn’t made anything or revolutionized any way of life. If I had to err on one side societally, I would much rather have the freedom for some people who don’t seem to add much value to get rich than to see even the slightest human advancements held back.

The more government will step out of the way of those seeking to bring advancement, the better off we are as a society. And it doesn’t just stop at the American borders – the better off we are as a human race.

This is a beautiful aspect that only America offers the world at this level and in this stage of history. One day I think a better world will have more room for that beautiful aspect that America offers, and hopefully many other societies will also offer the world.

There are those who act to restrain that development. Some don’t realize what they are doing – limiting human advancement. Some do realize what they are doing – their is a strange poverty mindset inherent in many such philosophies. Some eastern religious beliefs that developed under great poverty are such examples – to the extent that they appear practically pessimistic. They are hard to reconcile in the world of plenty that we have today. Stuck in that moralistic poverty mindset, such beliefs have a hard time providing pertinent messages for us in our time. Even the poorest Americans see much higher quality of life and enjoy higher life expectancy than people throughout much of human history. That development for some of the poorest is only improving as government steps out of the way and allows innovation to take place unchecked.

I so keenly favor this process that I have a hard time justifying government at all these days. When someone praises social security or the idea of universal basic income, I know I am speaking to someone who doesn’t understand markets, doesn’t understand US history and doesn’t see this vital part of what makes America so special in the world.

America is a unique place for its personal freedom and for its economic freedom. They are one in the same. The more I travel the world, write about the world, do business in the world, the more I recognize that to be true. And when I recognize it, the more aggressively opposed I become to anyone who seeks to deny the world that amazing font of humanity and human potential.

How much worse it is when they use a bad and thoroughly disproven Western European “democratic socialist” model as the format for doing that. At least be creative. At least step beyond Plato’s benevolent dictator or Marx’s own brand of that tired system of communism. At least recognize that you aren’t right just because you invented an idea. At least recognize when your own brilliant ideas is really just a regurgitation of another’s broken idea. At least read critically enough to know when your “brilliant” idea is just that and only that and to know how poorly it has worked for many eras of human existence, in many iterations, in many cultures, and in many situations. This is no coincidence. Your anti-human idea, your anti-individual idea is no better than all those other slightly tweaked failures. The world deserves that self-criticism from you before you seek to promote those anti-human ideas.

Do better than that if you seek to undermine the wellspring of human achievement in hopes of providing better for those who do not provide well enough for their own wants and therefore find themselves turning to others to care for them. You at least owe the world that much. But that we do not often get. Because reading is hard, especially reading with the level of humility it takes to be well-read. Meanwhile being convinced that your own harebrained idea on how to improve socialism is unique is very easy and therefore common.

Do better. You owe it to the world. Before you give even the slightest suggestion that you desire to destroy a system that has brought so much human happiness and development, you owe that much to the world.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at He is from Chicago and spends most of his time traveling Europe and writing. You can find more of his writing at If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email. You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Photo credit: Rebane’s Ruminations

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment
  • join our mailing list
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments on